Estimating Human Cognitive Capacities: A Response to Landauer
نویسنده
چکیده
Thomas K. Landauer’s (1986) estimate of the capacity of normal human memory is deeply flawed. His estimate neither reflects the quantity of computational resources necessary for supporting a human-like memory, nor provides any constraint on a theory of such a memory. The roots of the problem lie in a m isunderstanding of the relationship of previous experience to intelligent behavior and therefore a failure to provide the kind of estimate that could be useful for constructing an AI or psychological theory of remembering. The word memory has two quite distinct meanings. One refers to the accumulated experience of a human being; it is the difference between a naive youth and a wise elder. Human memory is not confined to the ability to recognize previously seen objects or accurately reproduce previously seen texts. It is our memories that allow us to recognize and refine categories of objects or events, to-generate reasonable expectations and plans, or to focus attention on salient aspects of the environment, to name but a few of the tasks memory subserves. In short, human memory is the ability to bring previous experiences to bear on new situations. The other meaning of memory is the specifically defined term of information theorists, most commonly encountered in discussions of computers; that is, a device that can maintain one of several possible states as a result of past action, thereby preserving information over time. The smallest unit of memory is the smallest unit of information, or a bit. Any system whose state depends on some past event can be characterized in information theoretic terms, and the amount of information it can transfer from past events to current state can be measured in bits. Landauer’s goal seems to be to estimate the number of bits it would take to duplicate the store of experiences of a human being in a way that subserves the same functions as human memory. As Landauer acknowledges, the relationship between human-like memory and the underlying computer-memory requirements necessary to support it
منابع مشابه
An Estimate of How Much People Remember, Not of Underlying Cognitive Capacities
In my paper " How much do people remember? Some estimates of the quantity of Learned Information in long-term memory, " I tried to measure the amount of knowledge that people acquire and retain through experience. These were described as " black box " measurements of " functional information contents, " explicitly defined in the paper as " the amount of information transmitted from input to out...
متن کاملNeuroscientific kinds through the lens of scientific practice
is not conducive to the discovery of natural kinds of cognitive capacities. The “neurosciences of cognition” include cognitive neuroscience and cognitive neurobiology, two research areas that aim to understand how the brain gives rise to cognition and behavior. Some philosophers of neuroscience have claimed that explanatory progress in these research areas ultimately will result in the discover...
متن کاملCategorial compositionality continued (further): A category theory explanation for the systematicity of recursive cognitive capacities
Human cognitive capacity includes recursively definable concepts, which are prevalent in domains involving lists, numbers, and languages. Cognitive science currently lacks a satisfactory explanation for the systematic nature of recursive cognitive capacities. The category-theoretic constructs of initial F-algebra, catamorphism, and their duals, final coalgebra and anamorphism provide a formal, ...
متن کاملReasons, Robots and the Extended Mind
A suitable project for the new Millenium is to radically reconfigure our image of human rationality. Such a project is already underway, within the Cognitive Sciences, under the umbrellas of work in Situated Cognition, Distributed and Decentralized Cognition, Real-world Robotics and Artificial Life. Such approaches, however, are often criticized for giving certain aspects of rationality too wid...
متن کاملCategorial Compositionality III: F-(co)algebras and the Systematicity of Recursive Capacities in Human Cognition
Human cognitive capacity includes recursively definable concepts, which are prevalent in domains involving lists, numbers, and languages. Cognitive science currently lacks a satisfactory explanation for the systematic nature of such capacities (i.e., why the capacity for some recursive cognitive abilities-e.g., finding the smallest number in a list-implies the capacity for certain others-findin...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Cognitive Science
دوره 12 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1988